美国禁止TikTok和微信，法媒：严重“巴尔干化”网络的开始

【环球时报记者赵风英】“美国禁止TikTok和 ，绝对是严重‘巴尔干化’网络的开始！”美国总统特朗普日前签署行政令，计划在45天后“封杀” 和TikTok，这一消息令外界非常震惊，法国《世界报》9日以此为题予以批评。

《世界报》称，计算机代码在美国受言论自由保护，特朗普的行政令违反宪法。不过，这并不意味着他不能这样做。由于该法令的制定含糊不清，因此难以评估具体后果。但不少专家学者对互联网未来发展趋势感到担忧。电子前沿基金会网络安全主管伊娃·戈尔佩林强调：“如果美国禁止TikTok，将导致更严重的互联网‘巴尔干化’（互联网巴尔干化，指万维网分裂成有特定利益的不同子群，一个子群的成员几乎总是利用网络传播仅吸引本子群其他成员——编者注）。”戈尔佩林称，人们可能曾幻想互联网可以创造不分地域、不分用户、自由穿梭的世界。但如今，互联网被强加上了地域壁垒，早已与互联网设计者的初心越离越远。

Le Monde said that computer codes are protected by freedom of speech in the United States, and Trump's executive order is unconstitutional. But that doesn't mean he can't. As the enactment of the act is ambiguous, it is difficult to assess the specific consequences. But many experts and scholars are worried about the future development trend of the Internet. EVA gorepelin, network security director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, stressed: "if the United States bans tiktok, it will lead to a more serious" Balkanization "of the Internet (Internet Balkanization, which means that the world wide web is divided into different subgroups with specific interests. Members of a subgroup almost always use the Internet to spread and only attract other members of the subgroup - editor's note) Gore Palin said that people may have imagined that the Internet could create a world of free travel regardless of region and users. But now, the Internet has been imposed on the regional barriers, and has long been far away from the original intention of Internet designers.

法国《回声报》称，想进军 ，包括星巴克和耐克在内的很多美国企业可能都无法绕开 。因为与脸书和Instagram不同， 开发了将通信、电子商务甚至移动支付整合在一起的多项功能。此外，对于在美国生活的大量 留学生、 以及与 有往来的美国人来说， 是必备通信工具。美政府禁令的含糊不清加剧了人们的焦虑。

一项 民调显示，如果 遭禁，绝大多数受访者表示愿意更换苹果手机。《世界报》分析称，禁令可能迫使 在苹果和谷歌应用商店下架。这会导致苹果手机在 的销量下降。如此一来，禁令后果只能是“伤敌一千，自损八百”。

A Chinese poll shows that if wechat is banned, the vast majority of respondents would like to change their apple phones《 According to the analysis of Le Monde, the ban may force wechat to be removed from apple and Google App Stores. This will lead to a drop in sales of Apple phones in China. In this way, the consequence of the ban can only be "to hurt the enemy by one thousand and to hurt oneself by eight hundred".